Trump Declares Deal Plan Is Not Ultimate Proposal as Delegates Assemble for Swiss Meeting
Ex-leader Donald Trump remarked this past weekend that the Moscow-drafted peace plan constituted not his ultimate proposal, following fierce reaction from Ukraine's leaders and commentators who compared it to a 1938 Munich agreement between Chamberlain and Hitler.
In short comments at the White House, the US president informed reporters: Our goal is to achieve peace. This should have occurred earlier … we’re trying to get it ended, one way or the other it must be resolved."
Forthcoming Switzerland Negotiations Involve Multiple Countries
Ukrainian and American delegates will meet in Geneva this Sunday to discuss this proposal. Defense representatives from Germany, France, and the UK will also participate in these negotiations there.
Prior to the talks, US senators informed media outlets that State Department head Marco Rubio contacted them during his travel to Switzerland to clarify the nature of this disclosed proposal. According to him, this plan did not originate from the administration but instead a "wish list of the Russians", according to Senator Angus King, who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Zelenskyy Confronts Crucial Deadline
However, the former president has given Volodymyr Zelenskyy a deadline of Thursday to sign this multi-point agreement. The document requires Ukraine to give up land it currently controls to Moscow, reduce its military forces, and relinquish long-range weapons. It also rules out a European peacekeeping force and penalties for atrocities committed by Russia.
During a solemn address last Friday, Zelenskyy cautioned that his country faces a difficult decision in the near future between keeping the nation's honor and losing key ally in the shape of the US. Zelenskyy acknowledged that it faces one of the most difficult moments in its history.
Ukraine's Dialogue Team Appointed for Upcoming Meetings
In comments this weekend, the president emphasized that genuine or respectable peace was always based on assured safety and fairness. He revealed a negotiating team, appointed through a decree, which will meet American representatives in Switzerland, led by top aide Andriy Yermak.
A additional delegate from Ukraine's team, ex-defense head and security council official Umerov, said there would be discussions with the US "on the possible parameters of a future peace agreement".
Suggesting red lines, Umerov noted: "Ukraine approaches this process with a clear understanding of its interests. This represents a continuation of recent discussions focused on harmonizing our plans for future actions."
Global Reaction and Concerns
Zelenskyy has sought to participate positively with a White House seemingly determined to resolve the war on the Kremlin’s one-sided terms. He has made clear he cannot give up the nation's independence or disregard the constitutional framework that protects Ukraine's territorial integrity.
At a meeting in South Africa, G20 leaders and the European Council issued a collective declaration opposing Trump’s plan, saying it needs "additional work". The statement indicated that EU and Nato members would need to be consulted regarding certain clauses, that exclude Ukraine's NATO accession and put conditions on its future EU accession.
Citizen Views in Kyiv
Ukrainian reaction to the text, prepared by Putin’s envoy and Trump’s representative, has been overwhelmingly hostile. Analysts said it outlined a plan for further Russian aggression: not only of Ukraine but of other parts of Europe too.
Mustafa Nayyem, a journalist and politician involved in the 2014 Maidan protests, remarked it invited parallels with Chamberlain’s infamous Munich deal. Trumps’s peace plan came from the same "recognisable genre", with the victim invited to outline its own surrender for broader convenience.
On social media, Nayyem expressed his anger by the complete pardon for Russian atrocities. This offended those who sought shelter in affected cities – sites of civilian executions – and for those whose children had been forcibly deported to Russia. "A rather cynical agreement," he stated.
In an interview in Kyiv’s Golden Gate metro station, Sariskyi, a young adult, said that Russia has attempted to control Ukraine politically and territorially over many years. It conceded very little in the proposed deal and continued to keep troops in Ukraine. In my view, this deal aims to undermine Ukraine and impose unfair terms, he said.
If Zelenskyy signed off on the proposals Kyiv would be forced to sacrifice its liberties, he added. If it didn’t, the US might cease collaboration and intelligence exchange, a crucial source of military intelligence for frontline Ukrainian troops. "There is no good way out of this for now," he noted.
Diverse Perspectives from the Public
A different commuter, 19-year-old Barchan, said that Ukraine would "keep strong" without American support. We will continue our struggle as needed. Our territory will remain our territory, including Crimea and the east. They are Ukrainian land." She expressed that the president is intelligent and forecasted he would not cede territory.
Speaking during rainfall, near a historical monument, Ivanovna mentioned she was grateful to the former US leader for his attempts to broker peace. She suggested that the nation ought to consider ceding certain regions for a limited time if it ensured keeping America as a partner. "President Zelenskyy should hold a referendum and ask the people," she proposed.
EU Officials Condemn the Plan
Previous European leaders have strongly criticized the plan. Finland’s former prime minister Marin described it as a disaster, affecting not just Ukraine but for "all of the democratic world". She said if the west showed weakness and ignorance – similar to the 2014 Crimea annexation – "more aggression and conflicts" could arise.
Belgium's ex-PM, Guy Verhofstadt, referenced Churchill’s definition regarding appeasement as "one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last". He added: Trump aligns with Putin. Europe must choose again: appeasement or our values, imperialism or freedom. Another moment of truth for our [European] union."