🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – not just the winner overall, but block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and has become a kind of local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win while missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters favored Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

I had to do that because they were adding around 200,000 ballots into the system every few minutes! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: The candidate led the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of ballots that came in later and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which election day went kind of poorly for him, in which Cuomo was going to end up basically increasing his support from the earlier contest. However Mamdani added half a million votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, young, renters and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president last year went for Zohran now. But it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the night was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought it could go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s favored to get over 50%. He’s at just over 50% but remain probably 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus it’s not it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it because afterwards no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an highly conservative area. That really surprised me. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these Republicans on Staten Island with a high participation. I think occurred a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view existed some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the Greek landlords and residents supported Cuomo. Thus there was a little resistance. But overall, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

There are areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they favored Cuomo. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that key figures from progressives come from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be more of that – candidates will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that each urban center in America could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.